Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 02:42

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Is Max Verstappen unstoppable this season?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
How do you choose sunscreen for oily skin?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
A two-player Elden Ring Nightreign PC Mod is already available - Eurogamer
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Donald Trump's family launches 'Made in America' T1 smartphone. Here's what it offers - Mint
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Raw Milk Is Trending — Here's Why Doctors Are Seriously Concerned - BuzzFeed
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Rune Factory: Guardians of Azuma Review - RPGFan
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?